|
2004
Elections: Candidate Comments
| Political
Parties |
| CP
= Conservative Party |
| GP
= Green Party |
| Ind.
= Independent candidate |
| NDP
= New Democratic Party |
| LP
= Liberal Party |
| Questions: |
| 1. |
Do
you support federal government measures to allocate
the necessary funds to fully complete this environmental
impact assessment, yes or no? |
| 2. |
Should
the study sanction the restoration of fish passage by
replacing a portion of the Petitcodiac causeway with
a partial bridge, will you support swift measures by
the federal government to allocate the necessary funds
to implement the environmental restoration project to
follow, yes or no? |
| Below
are the answers to the two questions on are survey as well
as comments by each candidat running in the 2004 federal general
election in the Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, Fundy and Beauséjour
ridings. |
Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe
BRADSHAW,
Claudette (Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, LP)
| Comments |
| «I
support swift measures by the federal government to
undertake this project, in partnership with the province
and the municipalities.» |
|
HAMEL,
Judith (Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, GP)
| Comments |
«The
Green Party considers it essential to leave to our children
and
grandchildren a world that is in better shape than we
found it. It is in our
opinion, the most honourable goal to have as a society.
Around the world,
the Green movement has shown leadership by putting into
motion what is
needed to secure a better future for all people, all
species and the planet.
This future depends on the actions that the political
leaders are taking
today. Among
its many policies, The Green Party’s platform
is proposing Deep
Ecology. Deep Ecology is the name for a way of thinking
that views human
beings and human economic activity as just one part
of the larger life-system on our planet. We depend
on nature to support life and we must not allow short-term
interests to threaten the delicate balance of nature.
All life on earth shares an amount of land, water,
air and sunlight that will never increase. Yet many
governments share the deadly misconception that human
societies can grow without bound. The Green Party
seeks to promote an understanding of the finite carrying
capacities of our planet, as well as emphasize the
impact of human activities on our neighbouring ecosystems.
By drawing, and respecting, the boundaries of responsible
and non-destructive behaviour, we can begin to live
up to the challenge of Deep Ecology. The human being
is indissociable from nature. Il it illusionary to
believe we can do it without taking the ecosystems
into account. What a human does to living things,
he does to himself. Within The Green Party, we also
recognize the diversity of life on Earth. Every plant
and animal has the right to exist independently of
human needs. We must take responsibility for our lives,
our families, our communities and the whole planet.
By showing that we are responsible, we inspire others
to do the same.
Many
members of The Green Party now use the famous slogan
“Think globally, act locally.” As a matter
of fact, this statement is at the heart of the
environmental policies of The Green Party. It is in
respect to our global
position on the planet that we must first act locally
to situations that threaten ecological integrity.
Local situations cannot be dissociated of
their ties to the entire ecosystem of the planet.
In
South-eastern New Brunswick, the Petitcodiac, a unique
river, has long
been a symbol of pride for the population. For a long
time now, the
ecological integrity of this river has been threatened
to the point of it
being nationally and internationally recognized as
“the most endangered
river in Canada.” Past pride has been replaced
by shame on a national and
even international scale. It has been amply and clearly
established by the
Petitcodiac Riverkeeper that the restoration of the
river is the only
sensible solution, and this has been supported by
conclusive studies as well
as by public opinion. The major obstacle to the restoration
of the river is
the lack of commitment from the governments. If at
the outset, the causeway
was considered an economic development project, it
has now long been
considered as one of the worst development mistakes
in New Brunswick, given the harmful effects on the
ecosystems of the river and of the surrounding
environment. The lack of government commitment has
only contributed in
compounding the damage. It is now urgent to undertake
the restoration of the
Petitcodiac River.
The
Green Party supports the Petitcodiac Riverkeeper’s
proposal to recycle
the causeway gates into an imposing outdoor monument,
once the decision is taken to replace the causeway
with a partial bridge. I agree with Daniel
LeBlanc’s statement : “We believe that
these five causeway gates have more
value to our community by standing out in the open
air than physically
blocking our river system”, and that “True
to our community’s motto of
“Resurgo” (Rise Again), the Petitcodiac
River will rise again one day soon
and make this community very proud. The revival of
our river will be historic”, suggests LeBlanc,
“and we should commemorated this in a special
way”.
As
The Green Party’s spokesperson for Arts, Culture
and Canadian Heritage, I applaud this project, which
will not only restore the ecological balance of the
Petitcodiac River and the surrounding ecosystems but
will also demonstrate
an extraordinary regional cultural initiative for
our heritage.
Since
my highest priority in this election campaign is the
improvement of
the quality of life in our region, environmentally,
culturally, economically and socially, the restoration
of the Petitcodiac River is one of its foundation
blocks.
The
Green Party believes that the only people truly qualified
to improve a region’s way of life are those
who live and work there. The government must
support, not supplant the efforts and services put
forth by local organization and volunteers. What makes
the quality of life? It’s good work in harmony
with the community. It is the duty of government representatives
never to forget this important role.» |
|
LAPOINTE,
Hélène (Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, NDP)
| Comments |
«I
have always been in favour of restoring the Petitcodiac
River, before,
during and after the 2004 election campaign. This was
the case as well
during the 2000 election campaign, during which Madame
Bradshaw had clearly indicated her support for the restoration
of the Petitcodiac. However, since her election, she
hasn't pushed this file at all. It is disappointing
to see
such a turn around from our federal MP !!!» |
|
LeBLANC,
Jean (Moncton-Riverview-Dieppe, CP)
|
Fundy
AMOS,
David Raymond (Fundy, Ind.)
| Comments |
| «18
million to study? To hell with the studies to well paid
entities. Simply remove the causeway and build a bridge
and allow the river to go back to the way it once was
all on its own. Less is more.» |
|
BACH,
Karin (Fundy, GP)
| Comments |
| «I
believe the environmental assessment is extremely important
and will clarify general concerns over further damaging
the river. I would work towards expediting the restoration.» |
|
HANRATTY,
Pat (Fundy, NDP)
|
HERRON,
John (Fundy, LP)
| Comments |
«1.
John Herron fully supports the EIA process because the
emphasis is science based. The only legitimate government
response must support the science. Herron supports the
process given the fact that it is science based and
an exclusive process, given that all the stakeholders
are involved in the process, conservationists, property
owners and fishers.
2. The Government has a duty to ensure that matters
related to compensation
are responded to with immense clarity on actions that
may need to be taken,
given that issues related to the potential compensation
are included within
the scope and framework of the EIA process now underway.
3. The objective can be nothing less than the restoration
of the Petitcodiac ecosystem and fish passage. The Government
of Canada has a moral and ethical duty to fund with
absolute enthusiasm any infrastructure that may be required
from recommendations from the EIA process including
the potential for a partial bridge.» |
|
MOORE,
Rob (Fundy, CP)
| Answers
|
| 1. |
Did
not answer the survey* |
| 2. |
Did
not answer the survey* |
| Comments |
| *
Moore's campaign manager told us that as a rule
he is not answering any surveys during the campaign.
He added that Moore's position on the Petitcodiac is
to maintain the status quo. |
|
Beauséjour
BOURQUE,
Omer (Beauséjour, NDP)
|
GIROUARD,
Anna (Beauséjour, GP)
| Comments |
| I
am completely confident that M. Daniel LeBlanc and his
team will succeed in finding ways to restore the river
as it should be. |
|
LeBLANC,
Dominic (Beauséjour, LP)
| Comments |
| «From
the beginning, I have always supported the work of the
Petitcodiac Riverkeeper. I firmly believe that we must
restore the free flow of the Petitcodiac River and I
will take all necessary measures to make this project
happen quickly. » |
|
VAUTOUR,
Angela (Beauséjour, CP)
| Answers |
| 1. |
No
Response |
| 2. |
No
response |
|
|
 |