|
Riverkeeper Launches
List of 10 Worst Pollution Sources for 2002
(Complete Report)
(Moncton,
January 16, 2003) The environmental organisation Petitcodiac
Riverkeeper has unveiled its first ever annual list of the 10
Worst Pollution Sources of the Petitcodiac River system in 2002,
with the New Brunswick Department of Transportation leading the
pack of the year's worst 'polluters' for its operation and ownership
of the Petitcodiac causeway.
The
term 'pollution source' employed by the Riverkeeper in its report
refers to an activity by individuals, corporations or government
agencies that have caused and continues to cause a single or multiple
negative impact on the water quality, the habitat and the ecological
integrity of the Petitcodiac River system (the 3000 km2 Watershed
and its tributaries that comprise the Petitcodiac River, Memramcook
River and Shepody Bay).
The
objective of the exercise is to assist the Riverkeeper in identifying
the issues that have the greatest negative impacts on the Petitcodiac
River ecosystem, to educate the public on the most urgent environmental
issues facing the watershed, to encourage those parties responsible
for the negative impacts to take corrective action, to promote
sound watershed management practices for the ecosystem and to
repeat the classification exercise on an annual basis.
The
full report of the 10 Worst Pollution Sources of the Petitcodiac
River system in 2002 can be found on the Riverkeeper's web site
(www.petitcodiac.org). The list reads as follows:
| The
10 Worst Pollution Sources in 2002 |
Responsible
Party(ies)/Owner(s) |
| 1.
Petitcodiac causeway |
NB
Department of Transportation |
| 2.
Greater Moncton Sewerage Primary Treatment Plant |
Greater
Moncton Sewerage Commission |
| 3.
Former Moncton riverside landfill |
City
of Moncton |
| 4.
Memramcook causeway |
NB
Department of Transportation |
| 5.
Untreated sanitary sewage discharges |
Various
Municipal Governments including the Greater Moncton Sewerage
Commission |
| 6.
Stormwater discharges |
Various
Municipal Governments and the NB Department of Transportation |
| 7.
Habitat destruction and watercourse alterations |
Various
Private Developers |
| 8.
Sediment pollution |
Various
Municipal Governments and the NB Department of Transportation |
| 9.
Wetland destruction |
Various
Private Developers |
| 10.
Cosmetic pesticides |
Cosmetic
pesticide users |
In assessing the order of importance and the frequency
in which the 'polluters' appear in the report, the Petitcodiac
Riverkeeper noted that the six worst pollution sources designated
for the Petitcodiac River ecosystem in 2002 were all caused by
government or public agencies:
- The NB Department of Transportation (no. 1,
4 and 6)
- The Greater Moncton Sewerage Commission (no. 2 and 5), and
- Various Municipal Governments including the City of Moncton
(no. 3, 5 and 6)
"It doesn't show a good example when government
agencies contribute the largest share of the deterioration taking
place in our ecosystem" says Daniel LeBlanc, Petitcodiac
Riverkeeper's Executive Director. "It is even more worrying
when these 'polluters' are accountable to other government agencies
whose job it is to enforce environmental laws".
The Petitcodiac causeway was chosen as 2002's
Worst Pollution Source for its widespread negative impact on the
entire ecosystem and for its responsibility in eliminating at
least five aquatic species from the river. The Greater Moncton
Primary Treatment Plant was designated as last year's second worst
pollution source, citing the 50 to 70 million litres of primary
treated effluent that is discharged daily into the Petitcodiac
River.
According to LeBlanc, the watershed audit performed
by the Riverkeeper also enabled the group to arrive at four other
findings regarding the state of the Petitcodiac River ecosystem
in 2002. "Our first finding is that every pollution problem
identified in our report has a recognised and documented solution
which can be implemented", said LeBlanc.
"Secondly, these solutions appear not to
have been implemented yet in our watershed either as a result
of weak environmental policy by governments serving this region
or a lack of environmental law enforcement. Our third finding
is that while large and publicly owned infrastructures currently
create the greatest environmental damage to our ecosystem, the
'pollution sources of the future' all seem to revolve around development
issues". In other words, perhaps the worst side effect of
our region's growth, explains LeBlanc, is that these developments
often result in severe negative impacts on our ecosystem. "This
doesn't need to happen if we create and apply sound environmental
management policies for our region".
Finally, the Riverkeeper also notes that the greatest
pollution action caused by 'individuals' in the watershed is most
probably linked to the ongoing and widespread use of cosmetic
pesticides. "Unlike the Town of Shediac, the Village of Caraquet
and dozens of other municipalities across Canada that have enacted
bans on the use of cosmetic pesticides in their jurisdictions,
no actions have yet been taken in that direction by municipalities
of this watershed", remarks LeBlanc.
"Our intention is to continue publishing
the 10 Worst Pollution Source list on an annual basis, said LeBlanc,
with the hope that those who appear on it will take corrective
measures to eliminate their harm to the ecosystem". Two days
ago, the Riverkeeper also announced the 2002 recipient of their
newly created Petitcodiac River Award, Dieppe's l'École
Amirault, to recognise those that have made significant contributions
towards the protection of the Petitcodiac ecosystem.
-30-
INFORMATION:
Daniel LeBlanc, Petitcodiac Riverkeeper
(506) 388-5337
www.petitcodiac.org
|